Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home Donate | Store | Blog | FAQ | Jobs | Volunteer Positions | Contact | Bios | Forums | Projects | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: Administrator, Curator, or StaffJonathan Aizen Date: Nov 20, 2002 5:31am
Forum: etree Subject: Re: MP3->WAV->SHN

No point in doing this... The whole idea of having SHN files is not using MP3. In this case I'd just go MP3->WAV->MP3.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: BrokenBrick Date: Oct 5, 2004 2:26am
Forum: etree Subject: Re: MP3->WAV->SHN

My question is, if you convert an mp3 show to SHN, will it sound better, even though some of the original sound is lost, or will it just take up more space? I am not speaking technically, I just want to know if there will be an audible improvement in sound.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Blenda Date: Oct 5, 2004 8:45am
Forum: etree Subject: Re: MP3->WAV->SHN

"My question is, if you convert an mp3 show to SHN, will it sound better, even though some of the original sound is lost, or will it just take up more space?"

Short answer: It will not sound better.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Administrator, Curator, or StaffJonathan Aizen Date: Oct 5, 2004 8:49am
Forum: etree Subject: Re: MP3->WAV->SHN

The SHN will sound exactly as the WAV does, but misleads people into thinking it is lossless, which in fact it was encoded from MP3.

Jon